VoIP News
VoIP Providers
VoIP Books
VoIP Software
VoIP Jobs
VoIP Events Calendar
VoIP FAQ
Archives
Contact
About
Vonage Wins Permanent Stay in Patent Litigation
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington D.C. issued Vonage a permanent stay of a previous court's injunction that would have barred it from signing up new customers. Vonage sought the stay following an April 6th decision by the U.S. District Court in Alexandria, Va. enjoining the company from using certain VoIP technology to add new customers. The permanent stay enables Vonage to add new customers as we pursue our appeal. Existing customers remain unaffected by the company's ongoing patent litigation.
"We thank the appellate court for its thoughtful consideration of the merits of our case," said Jeffrey Citron, Vonage chairman and interim chief executive officer. "It's business as usual for us. We will continue providing reliable, quality digital phone service at the best value in the market and connecting thousands of phone calls every day. We remain focused on growing and strengthening our business and driving toward profitability."
Citron added, "We continue to believe we have not infringed on any of Verizon's technology and remain optimistic that we will ultimately prevail in this litigation."
Vonage will continue to serve existing customers by paying into escrow a quarterly royalty of 5.5 percent throughout the appeals process and by posting a $66 million bond as required by the court. The company's current cash position allows it to pay these fees to secure the stay as it continues to make progress on and pursues its legal appeal over the coming months.
Appeal
Vonage remains highly confident in the strength of its legal appeal.
"We believe the original verdict was based on an erroneous claim construction -- meaning the patents in this case were defined in an overly broad and legally unprecedented way," said Sharon O'Leary, Vonage's executive vice president, chief legal officer and secretary. "We believe the district court's decisions repeatedly neglected well-established law on claim construction and, as a result, artificially expanded the coverage of Verizon's patents well beyond what was intended by the patent trademark process."
O'Leary continued: "We are confident this error will be rectified by the appeals court, which hears intellectual property cases exclusively. As a result, we remain highly confident Vonage will prevail on appeal."
Posted on Apr 24, 2007
Reviews
|
Share
|
Digg
Filed in:
Vonage
All comments require the approval of the site owner before being displayed.
Post a Comment
Please use a valid e-mail address. Your address will not be publicly visible and is only a means for us to contact you when asked. Thank you.
Name
E-mail
(will show your
gravatar
icon)
Home page
Remember Me
Comment (Some html is allowed:
)
Enter the code shown (prevents robots):
All brand, company, and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their
respective owners. © 2012 VoIP Monitor. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy
Terms
SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to our RSS feed
Bookmark VoIPMonitor.net
Subscribe to our newsletter via email
News Categories
Asterisk
Bluetooth Headsets
E911
General
Hardware
Investments
iPad
iPhone
Mergers and Acquisitions
Mobile VoIP
Offbeat News
Security
SIP
VoIP Advice
VoIP Awards
VoIP Bloggers
VoIP Books
VoIP by Region
Africa
Asia
Australia
Europe
Middle East
North America
South America
VoIP Events
VoIP Jobs
VoIP Products
VoIP Promotions
VoIP Providers
ATT
Fusion
Google Talk
Lingo
MCI
MSN Messenger
Net2Phone
Packet8
Phone Power
Pingo
Qwest
RingCentral
SBC
Skype
SunRocket
Verizon
ViaTalk
Vonage
Yahoo Messenger
VoIP Reports
VoIP Software
VoIP Solutions
VoIP Wireless
WiFi
VoIP Information
Tom Keating
Alec Saunders
Andy Abramson
Garrett Smith
Jeff Pulver
Om Malik
Thoughts on VoIP
Solomon's VoIP World
VoIP Weblog
VoIP Guide
Archives
May, 2013 (2)
December, 2012 (3)
November, 2012 (7)
October, 2012 (19)
September, 2012 (5)
August, 2012 (10)
July, 2012 (24)
June, 2012 (18)
May, 2012 (28)
April, 2012 (20)
March, 2012 (16)
February, 2012 (12)
January, 2012 (12)
November, 2011 (21)
October, 2011 (28)
September, 2011 (23)
August, 2011 (26)
July, 2011 (26)
June, 2011 (38)
May, 2011 (59)
April, 2011 (49)
March, 2011 (67)
February, 2011 (68)
January, 2011 (54)
December, 2010 (45)
November, 2010 (43)
October, 2010 (47)
September, 2010 (43)
August, 2010 (32)
July, 2010 (28)
June, 2010 (39)
May, 2010 (46)
April, 2010 (36)
March, 2010 (52)
February, 2010 (45)
January, 2010 (44)
December, 2009 (41)
November, 2009 (46)
October, 2009 (54)
September, 2009 (58)
August, 2009 (29)
July, 2009 (36)
June, 2009 (32)
May, 2009 (32)
April, 2009 (13)
March, 2009 (47)
February, 2009 (37)
January, 2009 (53)
December, 2008 (44)
November, 2008 (56)
October, 2008 (51)
September, 2008 (50)
August, 2008 (41)
July, 2008 (50)
June, 2008 (52)
May, 2008 (53)
April, 2008 (64)
March, 2008 (59)
February, 2008 (53)
January, 2008 (65)
December, 2007 (39)
November, 2007 (33)
October, 2007 (65)
September, 2007 (29)
August, 2007 (52)
July, 2007 (49)
June, 2007 (59)
May, 2007 (64)
April, 2007 (43)
March, 2007 (66)
February, 2007 (100)
January, 2007 (108)
December, 2006 (86)
November, 2006 (100)
October, 2006 (86)
September, 2006 (55)
August, 2006 (31)
July, 2006 (76)
June, 2006 (79)
May, 2006 (87)
April, 2006 (45)
March, 2006 (55)
February, 2006 (55)
January, 2006 (56)
December, 2005 (53)
November, 2005 (61)
October, 2005 (13)
September, 2005 (42)
August, 2005 (57)
April, 2005 (57)
March, 2005 (21)
February, 2005 (15)